Home | ICEIE 2025

About the Conference

Welcome to the inaugural 2025 International Conference on Educational Innovations and Excellence (ICEIE 2025): Exploring Technologies, Policies, and Social Dynamics!

Scheduled for October 16-17th, 2025, in the culturally rich city of Bath, UK, ICEIE 2025 is set to be a landmark event for the educational community. This conference is designed to be a cornerstone for scholars, practitioners, and visionaries to converge and delve into the depths of educational innovation.

At ICEIE 2025, we are dedicated to fostering a collaborative and intellectually stimulating environment. Our program is curated to include a variety of formats that cater to different modes of engagement, including:

Plenary Sessions: Featuring renowned experts sharing their insights on the most pressing issues in education.
Panel Discussions: Interactive forums with industry leaders discussing the latest trends and challenges.
Networking Opportunities: Creating spaces for professionals to connect, collaborate, and explore partnerships.

We are particularly excited about the ICEIE 2025 Conference Proceedings, which will publish selected papers post-peer review, contributing to the academic discourse and providing a reference for future research. Additionally, ICEIE 2025 will offer a platform for the recognition of outstanding contributions to the field through our Awards Program.

ICEIE 2025 is more than just a conference; it's an opportunity to be at the forefront of educational change. Register now to participate in this groundbreaking event where we will shape the narrative of education together.

Call for Paper

The 2025 International Conference on Educational Innovations and Excellence (ICEIE 2025) is an academic platform focusing on advancements in education. It features four tracks:

Educational Technology and Innovation: Discussing AI in education, e-learning platforms, VR/AR in teaching, and educational analytics.
Education Policy and Practice: Covering global education trends, equity, teacher development, and curriculum design.
Education in the Context of Society: Exploring the impact of socioeconomics, globalization, and media on education.
Education and Educational Psychology: Focusing on mental health, child development, learning strategies, and social skills in education.

ICEIE 2025 is designed to foster dialogue among professionals on the latest educational research and practices.

Details

Submission

All papers will be reviewed by the Committee on the basis of quality, relevance, originality, significance, and clarity. Please submit your full paper by email with both .doc/.docx and .pdf formats attached directly to committee01@yeah.net. Papers that do not comply with the submission guidelines will be rejected without review.

Publication

Accepted papers will be included and published in Conference Proceedings, which will be submitted to databases below:

CPCI (subject to acceptance)
CNKI
Google Scholar
Crossref

Download

Conference Proceedings uses author-prepared PDFs for publication.

It is important to ensure that your paper complies with the template format.

Download Template

Clients

Important Dates

Abstract Submission

August 5, 2025

Full Paper Submission

September 5, 2025

Notification of Acceptance Date

September 20, 2025

Final Paper Submission

October 1, 2025

The proceeding adheres to a rigorous, double-blind peer review process to ensure academic quality and ethical standards. Key steps are outlined below:

Manuscript Allocation: Within one week after submission, the Editor-in-Chief assigns each manuscript to 2–3 independent reviewers with expertise aligned to the paper’s topic. Reviewers must declare no conflicts of interest (e.g., collaborations, institutional affiliations, or financial ties with authors) prior to participation.
Initial Screening (1 week): Reviewers conduct a preliminary check for compliance with formatting guidelines, structural completeness (abstract, methods, results, etc.), and thematic relevance. Manuscripts failing to meet basic standards are desk-rejected, with detailed feedback provided to authors.
In-Depth Evaluation (3 weeks): Reviewers assess the manuscript’s originality, methodological validity, data integrity, and contribution to the field. Evaluations include:
- A categorical rating (Accept/Minor Revision/Major Revision/Reject)
- Constructive comments for improvement
- A confidential recommendation to the Editor
Decision-Making & Conflict Resolution: The Editor consolidates reviews and resolves discrepancies through panel discussions. Final decisions prioritize both scholarly rigor and a target acceptance rate of [40%], which balances selectivity with support for emerging research. Borderline manuscripts may undergo additional review or statistical validation.↳
Author Notification: Authors receive a decision within 1-week post-review, including anonymized reviewer comments. Accepted manuscripts proceed to production; others may be invited to resubmit after revision (2-month revision window).
Revisions & Appeals: Revised manuscripts are re-evaluated within 2 weeks. Authors may appeal decisions with a point-by-point rebuttal, which triggers an independent audit by the Editorial Board.

By submitting a paper to ICFMDE 2025, the authors agree to the review process and understand that papers undergo a peer-review process. Manuscripts will be reviewed by appropriately qualified experts in the field selected by the conference committee, who will give detailed comments, and if the submission gets acceptance, the authors submit a revised version that takes into account this feedback. All papers are reviewed using a double-blind review process. The Committees of ICFMDE 2025 invest great efforts in reviewing the papers submitted to the conference and organizing the sessions to enable the participants to gain maximum benefit.

COPE Compliance: All participants follow the COPE Ethical Guidelines.
Gender/Geographic Inclusion: Reviewers evaluate whether gender, race, or geographic factors are appropriately addressed.↳
Diversity Auditors: 2 committee members monitor demographic balance in accepted papers quarterly.
AI Usage: AI tools (e.g., plagiarism detection, statistical error flags) assist but never replace human judgment.

Reviewers are typically asked to evaluate papers based on several criteria:

Originality and Innovation: Is the paper presenting new ideas, methodologies, or findings? Does it contribute to the advancement of the field?
Technical Soundness: Are the methods used sound and appropriate? Is the analysis rigorous? Are the results well-supported by the data?
Relevance to the Conference: Does the paper fit within the scope of the conference themes and tracks?
Clarity and Organization: Is the paper well-organized, with clear arguments and structure? Are the ideas presented in a coherent and understandable way?
Literature Review and References: Does the paper appropriately engage with existing literature? Is there a clear understanding of the state of the field?
Ethical Considerations: Does the research adhere to ethical standards, especially in areas like data privacy, human subjects, etc.?
Practical Implications: For applied research, reviewers will also assess the potential practical impact or applications of the findings.
Each of these criteria is typically scored on a numerical scale (e.g., 1-5), and reviewers are asked to provide detailed feedback and suggestions for improvement.